Global compliance

Built to clear procurement in the EU, UK and United States

FlagFake is designed for regulated buyers. This page sets out the contractual, residency and governance controls we offer, and is maintained by FlagFake — it is not an independent audit, certification or legal advice.

Regional coverage

Verification touches identity documents, payroll records and financial evidence. Each region treats that data differently, so the controls follow the region.

Global data residency map showing EU, UK and US processing regions with secure connections
EU

European Union

GDPREU AI ActeIDAS 2.0 contextNIS2-aware controls

EU data residency option, a signed Data Processing Agreement with defined processing purposes, Standard Contractual Clauses where data leaves the EEA, and documented sub-processor disclosure.

UK

United Kingdom

UK GDPRData Protection Act 2018ICO guidance

UK Addendum to the SCCs, UK/EU hosting, records of processing support and DSAR handling within statutory deadlines.

US

United States

CCPA / CPRAState privacy lawsGLBA-aware workflowsFCRA boundaries

US region hosting, service-provider contract terms, consumer rights request support and clear limits so verification output is never used as a consumer report or adverse-action basis on its own.

INTL

Other jurisdictions

PIPEDALGPDDPDP Act 2023PDPA

Regional terms and hosting are agreed case by case during procurement. Tell us your jurisdictions and we confirm what we can support in writing.

Controls your legal and security teams will ask about

The questions that come up in every corporate review, answered up front.

Residency

Choose where files live

Select an EU, UK or US processing region for uploads, derived artefacts and reports at the account level.

Contracts

DPA, SCCs & UK Addendum

Standard processor terms, transfer mechanisms and a named data protection contact, executable before your first upload.

Retention

Configurable deletion windows

Set retention per document type from zero-retention to your statutory period, with on-demand deletion of any file and its artefacts.

Access

SSO, RBAC and audit trail

SAML/OIDC single sign-on, analyst / reviewer / approver / admin roles and immutable logs of every view, escalation and deletion.

AI transparency

Explainable, human-reviewable output

Every verdict carries a confidence score and the forensic reasoning behind it, so a human reviewer stays accountable for the decision.

Model use

No training on your uploads

Customer files are used to perform the verification you requested. We do not sell customer data and do not train models on customer uploads without explicit written consent.

Vendor due diligence pack

Available on request

  • Security questionnaire and vendor assessment responses
  • Data Processing Agreement, SCCs and UK Addendum
  • Sub-processor list with change notification
  • Data flow and retention documentation
  • Penetration test summary and remediation status (under NDA)
  • Business continuity, incident response and breach notification process
  • Insurance certificates and supplier onboarding forms

How we state our position

We only claim what we can evidence. Where a certification is in progress rather than held, we say so in writing. Where a control is your responsibility — lawful basis for verifying a third party's document, who you grant access to, the retention window you configure — we say that too.

Automated verification results are probabilistic forensic assessments, not legal determinations. They are intended to support a trained human reviewer, never to replace one in decisions that affect a person's employment, credit or legal standing.

Data subject and consumer rights

Access & portability

DSAR support

We assist controllers in locating, exporting and explaining any personal data processed on their behalf, within the deadlines set by the applicable regime.

Erasure

Right to deletion

Deletion requests remove the source file, derived artefacts and report content; audit metadata is retained only where law requires it.

Objection

Human review

Any individual affected by a verification outcome can request that a qualified reviewer re-examine the case rather than rely on the automated score.